Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Marius Copil Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W W L L L
Form
L L L L L L L L L LHead-2-Head: Stakhovsky 3 - 1 Copil
They have played 8 sets in total, with Stakhovsky winning 6 and Copil winning 2. The last match between Stakhovsky and Copil was at the Surbiton Challenger, 10-06-2017, Quarterfinals, Grass with Marius Copil getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | 3 |
| Marius Copil | 1 |
Surbiton Challenger(10-06-2017)
7
5
6
4
| Stakhovsky | Stats | Copil |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 706 |
| 31 | Highest Rank | 56 |
| 39 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 8 |
| 55% (676-557) | Career Total W/L | 54% (508-429) |
| $2,604,568 | Career Prize Money | $1,305,320 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Samsonova VS Dolehide PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Stakhovsky VS Copil H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Marius Copil
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 6-4 6-0 |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Marius Copil
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Marius Copil
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
10
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Marius Copil
85%
(
52 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Stakhovsky VS Copil H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 46 | Games Won | 32 |
| 21 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 1:11:21 | Average Match Time | 1:11:21 |
| 67% (157/234) | 1st Serve % | 63% (155/245) |
| 73% (115/157) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (113/155) |
| 65% (50/77) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (36/90) |
| 53% (10/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 19% (3/16) |
| 39% (96/245) | Return Points Win % | 29% (69/234) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sergiy Stakhovsky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
113)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
117
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Norbert Gombos
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Dan Added
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Dennis Novak
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
5
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
7
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
54 of
73)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
46 of
122)
116
Total Points Won
109
|
6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Marius Copil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Marius Copil
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Marius Copil
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
7
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marius Copil
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Marius Copil
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Marius Copil
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
Marius Copil
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (676/557) | Win/Loss | 54% (508/429) |
| 54% (1625/1402) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1182/1033) |
| 51% (15192/14448) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (11371/10901) |
| 55% (216/179) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (117/117) |
| 46% (112/132) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (151/166) |
| 59% (273/188) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (196/116) |
| 56% (75/58) | Grass Win/Loss | 59% (44/30) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.62 |
| 5829 | Aces Total | 6741 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 2178 | Total Double Faults | 2098 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:10:55 |
| 543.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 537.36 |
| 62% (40429/65448) | 1st Serve % | 59% (30669/52322) |
| 73% (29497/40429) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (23337/30669) |
| 50% (12558/25022) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (11393/21653) |
| 38% (2072/5490) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (1431/3829) |
| 37% (23876/65352) | Return Points Win % | 35% (18063/52250) |
| 48% (60/66) | Slam W/L | 44% (30/38) |
| 42% (37/52) | Masters W/L | 37% (17/29) |
| 63% (30/18) | Cups W/L | 60% (18/12) |
| 52% (206/189) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (95/91) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (335/223) | Challenger W/L | 55% (250/201) |
| 50% (8/8) | Futures W/L | 63% (98/58) |
| 55% (618/1117) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (492/897) |
| 48% (50/104) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 53% (290/548) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (238/454) |
| 52% (219/419) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (162/316) |
| 83% (677/559) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (511/424) |
| 17% (677/118) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (511/87) |
| 21% (556/117) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (426/81) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
